The Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) has re-arraigned former Governor of Plateau State, Jonah Jang and a cashier at the Office of the Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Yusuf Pam, for alleged N6.3 billion fraud.
Jang and Pan were first arraigned in June 2018, on 17-count charge bordering on misappropriation of funds, criminal breach of trust and corrupt advantages, contrary to the provisions of sections 315, 309, 19 and 22(5) of the Penal Code Law and Corrupt Practices Act 2004 (as amended).
Recall that Justice Daniel Longji, at his last sitting on the bench on December 29, 2019, dismissed the defendants’ no-case-submission, and held that they had a case to answer.
The state’s Chief Judge (CJ), Justice Yakubu Dakwak, reassigned the case to Justice Christy Dabup of Court IV for continuation of trial.
At the resumed hearing on Monday before Justice Dabup, counsel to the EFCC, A. O. Otolade applied for the fresh arraignment of the two defendants since the case was starting de novo (afresh).
He asked permission of the court to read the charges to the accused for them to take their pleas.
When the charges were read to the defendants, they pleaded not guilty.
The EFCC counsel then applied for an adjournment to enable the prosecution prepare for its case against the defendants.
He said the prosecution would be calling 15 witnesses to testify in the case.
READ ALSO: Alleged N6.3 bn Fraud: Statements I Made To EFCC Against Gov. Jang Was Taken Under Duress – Witness
Jang’s lawyer, Edward Pwajok (SAN) however, opposed the application for adjournment.
He also prayed the court to allow the bail earlier granted his client 2018 to subsist.
“My Lord, we wish to humbly apply orally that bail be granted the accused persons, as earlier granted to them on May 24, 2018, as well as maintain the bail bonds.
“The sureties who took them on bail are still willing to stand for them till the conclusion of this matter before your lordship,” Pwajok said.
Pam’s lawyer Sunday Odeh concurred with Pwajok’s plea.
While EFCC’s counsel did not object to their pleas, he, however, urged the court to order the sureties to produce affidavits to show that they were still standing for the defendants.
Justice Dabup granted the bail application and adjourned till May 26, 27 and 28 for definite hearing of the case.
She ordered the sureties to provide affidavits to the court within four days to show that they were still standing for defendants.
